In the paragraph Dave edited, I for some reason find the word "that" as
feeling out of place. I need to read it a few more times. His other edits
(on the run on sentence) are spot on.
Also, first paragraph:
s/exists according to current IETF procedure/exists according to the
current IETF procedure/
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On 7/22/2020 5:07 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and
publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard status, per
RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to include corrections and
clarifications only, such as verified errata and errata marked as "held
for document update", however the WG is not limited to only addressing
submitted errata. No new protocol extensions or amendments will be
considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis documents, unless they
are already published as RFCs.
Possible refinement to the wording of this paragraph:
This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and
will publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard
status, per RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to corrections
and clarifications only. In addition to processing existing, verified
errata and errata marked as "held for document update", the WG may
address newly-offered errata. However, no new protocol extensions or
amendments will be considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis
documents, unless they are already published as RFCs.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp