IETF SMTP (date)
July 29, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose", John C Klensin, 20:35
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose", Hector Santos, 14:09
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose", Keith Moore, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose", Dave Crocker, 11:19
- [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose", Michael Peddemors, 11:16
- [ietf-smtp] New mailing list for EMAILCORE effort, Alexey Melnikov, 11:03
July 28, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Hector Santos, 11:22
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Issueds listed in 5321bis Appendix GRe: and pending I-Ds (wasL Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF), Alessandro Vesely, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Keith Moore, 06:49
- [ietf-smtp] Issueds listed in 5321bis Appendix GRe: and pending I-Ds (wasL Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF), John C Klensin, 06:29
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Dave Crocker, 05:50
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Alessandro Vesely, 05:18
July 23, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, John Levine, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Hector Santos, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Keith Moore, 12:35
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Michael Peddemors, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Keith Moore, 11:28
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, John Levine, 10:43
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Michael Richardson, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Steve Atkins, 05:07
July 22, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Keith Moore, 23:14
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Keith Moore, 23:01
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, e sam, 21:37
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker, 21:19
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, e sam, 21:06
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine, 19:33
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Pete Resnick, 14:51
- [ietf-smtp] Template for Additional Work Items, Dave Crocker, 14:05
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine, 13:57
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine, 13:56
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Michael Richardson, 13:33
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker, 13:21
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Pete Resnick, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, John Levine, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John Levine, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John Levine, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, John C Klensin, 11:54
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Alexey Melnikov, 11:20
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Michael Peddemors, 10:56
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Alessandro Vesely, 10:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Ned Freed, 10:23
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, John C Klensin, 08:19
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Dave Crocker, 08:07
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Alexey Melnikov, 07:43
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Tim Wicinski, 07:42
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Alexey Melnikov, 07:40
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Dave Crocker, 07:37
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Tim Wicinski, 07:34
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Dave Crocker, 07:32
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Alexey Melnikov, 07:32
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Alexey Melnikov, 07:28
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Dave Crocker, 07:27
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Tim Wicinski, 07:27
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Alexey Melnikov, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Tim Wicinski, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Alexey Melnikov, 07:23
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Дилян Палаузов, 07:18
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Dave Crocker, 07:17
- [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be, Alexey Melnikov, 07:07
- [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF, Alexey Melnikov, 06:50
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dilyan Palauzov, 02:38
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Keith Moore, 01:04
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 00:49
July 21, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker, 22:54
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Keith Moore, 22:16
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin, 21:55
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine, 21:03
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Hector Santos, 20:55
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Hector Santos, 20:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Sam Varshavchik, 20:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Michael Richardson, 20:46
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker, 20:31
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 20:09
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Keith Moore, 19:49
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Kurt Andersen (b), 18:04
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Michael Richardson, 17:25
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin, 17:12
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick, 17:07
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Paul Smith, 16:47
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick, 16:18
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick, 16:17
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Hector Santos, 15:45
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine, 15:38
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Brandon Long, 15:35
- Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John Levine, 15:19
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Hector Santos, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 11:14
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Hector Santos, 11:10
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Michael Richardson, 07:55
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Dilyan Palauzov, 02:38
July 20, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John Levine, 21:55
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Michael Peddemors, 16:47
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John Levine, 13:27
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Alessandro Vesely, 02:51
July 19, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 14:45
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 14:10
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 13:20
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John Levine, 12:46
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:57
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John Levine, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Jeremy Harris, 05:18
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 01:19
July 18, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John Levine, 22:26
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, E Sam, 21:04
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 19:58
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, E Sam, 17:56
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, E Sam, 13:55
July 09, 2020
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: [dispatch] Forced SMTP redirects, John Levine, 23:31
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: [dispatch] Forced SMTP redirects, John C Klensin, 23:01
- [ietf-smtp] Fwd: [dispatch] Forced SMTP redirects, E Sam, 21:48
- Re: [ietf-smtp] CC'ing ticket systems, Valdis Klētnieks, 17:52
- Re: [ietf-smtp] CC'ing ticket systems, Valdis Klētnieks, 16:57