| 
 Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?2020-07-21 16:17:11
 
On 19 Jul 2020, at 11:57, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
 My personal server currently has 559 field names longer than that. The 
25 worst offenders:
X-Offlineimap-X706593913-6d61646475636b2e6e6574-494e424f582e647261667473
X-Gemstorm-Computing-T/A-The-It-Company-Mailscanner-Information
X-Ms-Exchange-Crosstenant-Originalattributedtenantconnectingip
X-Gemstorm-Computing-T/A-The-It-Company-Mailscanner-Spamcheck
X-Ssjmail.Ssjfinance.Com-Mail-Server-Mailscanner-Information
Staticcontent1_Header1_F731d3dc-Fd31-4161-Ad91-1083ba56853f
Staticcontent2_Header2_F731d3dc-Fd31-4161-Ad91-1083ba56853f
X-Mimedefang-Relay-15b21d6f94afe8e768c451e09085c007047aae7e
X-Mimedefang-Relay-89167b66339720c294cd81d33948afd6488b114f
X-Ssjmail.Ssjfinance.Com-Mail-Server-Mailscanner-Spamcheck
X-Ssjmail.Ssjfinance.Com-Mail-Server-Mailscanner-Spamscore
X-Gemstorm-Computing-T/A-The-It-Company-Mailscanner-From
X-Mailscan-242.Hostingdynamo.Net-Mailscanner-Information
X-Content-Pgp-Universal-Saved-Content-Transfer-Encoding
X-Kypusserverappliance-Kypus-Mailprotection-Information
X-Gemstorm-Computing-T/A-The-It-Company-Mailscanner-Id
X-Mailscan-242.Hostingdynamo.Net-Mailscanner-Spamscore
X-Mailer.Unfpa-Bangladesh.Org-Mailscanner-Information
X-Nugget-Enterprises-Antispam-Mailscanner-Information
X-Ssjmail.Ssjfinance.Com-Mail-Server-Mailscanner-From
X-Bangladesh-Open-University-Mailscanner-Information
X-Ironport.Danmargroup.Co.Za-Mailscanner-Information
X-Mail01lehostingservicesnet-Mailscanner-Information
X-First-Flight-Couriers-Ltd-Mailscanner-Information
X-Gemstorm-Computing-T/A-The-It-Company-Mailscanner
 
Other than X- field names not doing what people think they're doing, I 
don't see the problem here. None of them are over 77 characters, and 
none (including the ones you showed later with curly braces in them) are 
using problematic characters. So what's the problem? 
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C KlensinRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, (continued)
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Hector Santos
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John R Levine
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, Dave Crocker
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?,
Pete Resnick <=
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Keith Moore
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin
Re: [ietf-smtp]  Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Sam Varshavchik
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Keith Moore
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Ned Freed
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Alexey Melnikov
 |  
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious, John C Klensin |  
| Next by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick |  
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, Pete Resnick |  
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?, John C Klensin |  
| Indexes: | [Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |  | 
 |