Dilyan Palauzov <Dilyan(_dot_)Palauzov(_at_)aegee(_dot_)org> wrote:
> As useless mail headers do make emails heavier, I am in favour of
removing
> DKIM-Signature headers, that are known to be broken, e.g. because the
> current host has modified (and resubmitted) the message. Or if not
> completely removed, then at least shortened by substituting to
“b=invalided”
> or “b=invalidated-on-host-A.B”. The latter is more useful than just
having
> an invalid dkim-signature. (or removing the b=/bh= tags and putting
instead
> a new tag containing the host where the signature was broken, which not
> really an Authenticated Receiver Chain, and does make the massage
shorter).
"I, host-A.B, (failed-to) validated the DKIM header from C.D, but I removed it
when I
broke the message"
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp