Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, sh

Dilyan Palauzov <Dilyan(_dot_)Palauzov(_at_)aegee(_dot_)org> wrote:
    > As useless mail headers do make emails heavier, I am in favour of  
removing
    > DKIM-Signature headers, that are known to be broken, e.g.  because the
    > current host has modified (and resubmitted) the message.   Or if not
    > completely removed, then at least shortened by substituting  to 
“b=invalided”
    > or “b=invalidated-on-host-A.B”.  The latter is more  useful than just 
having
    > an invalid dkim-signature. (or removing the  b=/bh= tags and putting 
instead
    > a new tag containing the host where  the signature was broken, which not
    > really an Authenticated Receiver  Chain, and does make the massage 
shorter).

"I, host-A.B, (failed-to) validated the DKIM header from C.D, but I removed it 
when I
broke the message"

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp