[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] EHLO domain validation requirement in RFC 5321

2020-09-27 10:43:24
On 9/27/20 11:40 AM, John R Levine wrote:

I would say instead that because some subset of inbound MTAs do EHLO verification, "real mail servers" (i.e. those which manage to continue to deliver mail with some reliability) are forced to have static IPv4 source addresses for which PTR lookup results match EHLO arguments.

No, we've observed in practice that hosts that don't have matching PTRs are spambots.

I don't believe that anyone takes enough time to look at a sufficient volume of email, often enough, to be sure of that. And again, it's a self-fulfilling belief.

Anything that comes from a dynamic or NAT pool is invariably spam from a botnet.

No, because nobody is looking that closely.

Sorry, but you're just wrong.  We absolutely look that closely.  I know people who maintain pools of patterns to recognize dynamic pool rDNS which lots of people use in their spam scoring.

I didn't say it wasn't used, I said it wasn't reliably measured.

It would be nice if mail still worked the way it did 30 years ago, but that was most definitely then, and this is now.

And poorly chosen spam filters are a big reason for the degradation of email reliability during that time.


ietf-smtp mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>