ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] Discussion about draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header

2022-01-27 03:10:04
... saw that i've sent the reply just to Ale.

Thanks for the explanation. I'm going to cite RFC 6590 with the next
revision.

Am 22.01.22 um 13:06 schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
On Thu 20/Jan/2022 13:42:43 +0100 Jan-Philipp Benecke wrote:
Am 19.01.22 um 19:52 schrieb Alessandro Vesely:

The practice to redact information could be mentioned.
Could you give me a little more detail on what you expect here?
Do you mean the general existing practice to redact information?


J.D. Falk recommends to redact the recipient email address throughout
RFC 6449.  Since you cite that, you could as well cite RFC 6590.


Why shouldn't messages automatically filtered to the Junk folder be
reported? Isn't it interesting?

Good point, the information about automatic filtering is of course
interesting as well.
The more i think about it, the more i think that this decision should be
made by the mailbox provider and not by the I-D.


The I-D can provide a means to express that decision.


Best
Ale

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>