ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-25 22:50:03
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:18:20 PDT, Bill Manning said:
      The 2q2000 data for the in-addr tree shows 77402 unique
      servers answering for 693,337 zones.  
      19515 servers blocked/refused data. Of the 57887 that 
      answered, these are the numbers for improper configuration:

      BAD_SERVER:     4278
      FORMERR:        8
      NXDOMAIN:       28

      So, of the 57,887 visable servers, 4314 are improperly configured 
      in the visable in-addr.arpa. tree.  Thats 7.45% of the
      servers being "not well maintained".  I know of no similar data
      (... for forward data ...)

        Rather than continue to whine about lack of data, this is 
        the .US forward zone data:

        9928 unique servers answering for 33299 zones. 2165 servers blocked
        or refused data. Of the 7763 that answered, these are the numbers
        for improper configuration:
        
        BAD_SERVER:     14
        FORMERR:        2
        NXDOMAIN:       29

        So, of the 7763 visable servers, 45 are improperly configured in the
        visable US. tree. Thats 4.53% of those servers being "not well
        maintained.

        Keith, These two data points seem to bear your assertion out.

        in-addr.arpa    7.45% - poorly managed
        us.             4.53% - poorly managed


--bill