Craig,
From RFC 1287:
"If I could PING you, and you could PING me, then we were both on the
Internet, and a satisfying working definition of the Internet could
be constructed as a roughly transitive closure of IP-speaking
systems. This model of the Internet was simple, uniform, and -
perhaps most important - testable. The IP-connectivity model clearly
distinguished systems that were "on the Internet" from those that
were not."
In the same RFC, we proposed a different answer to your "what *IS*
the Internet?" question, based not on IP (network address)
connectivity but on the shared domain name space managed by DNS -
"the Internet" consists of entities nameable within the DNS, however
they may be interconnected by underlying networks.
- Lyman
At 1:43 AM -0400 7/8/00, Craig Simon wrote:
Eric Brunner wrote:
> Anyone else with a normative legal reference, your favorite
...
I saw this in someone's sig line.
But what *IS* the internet?
It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive symmetric
closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP packet from".
--Seth Breidbart
cls
-
This message was passed through ietf+censored(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no, which
is a sublist of ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) Not all messages are passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Harald Alvestrand.