Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
PS - is no one else alarmed by the re-publishing of material
submitted under an explicit agreement for 'removal after 6 mos'?
Yes. More generally the presumption that RFC doesn't mean "Request for
Comments" and that the explicit withdrawal of the preliminary form has
been over-ridden by a claim for third-party archival persistence.
Interesting that anyone thinks that such claims can
be retroactively overridden.
Joe