RFCs should not be referencing I-Ds, imho. if they *do*, then something
slipped through the cracks, imho. (if they do, i assume it is because during
the RFC's pre-life as an I-D it referenced companion I-Ds and the companion
either died some deserved death on its way to RFCdom, or the companion made it
to RFCdom, but the citation was never updated.)
pgpKrEkZK0hoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature