Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:11:29 EST, Dave Robinson said:
> What's the problem with locally significant addresses?  Having thousands of
Hmm.. this from a guy posting from endtoend.com?  I'm not sure if the
right word is "ironic" or "sarcastic".  In any case, didn't we just
release an RFC detailing in excruciating detail?
-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

pgpkcDfntBbgk.pgp
Description: PGP signature