Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?

ietf

Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?

2000-12-26 19:20:03

actually, if it is a delivery failure notification, 1123 5.3.3 would seem
to apply.  mail bounces are to be sent to the MAIL FROM: not the original
sender.  or even if they were sent to the from: we would not see them.

this <bleep> has been designed to be max annoying.  get the word out.  tell
folk NOT TO BUY ANTIGEN.

randy

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Denial of Service by Spamware?, Daniel Senie Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Randy Bush <= Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Perry E. Metzger Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Randy Bush Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Vernon Schryver Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Christopher Ambler Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Vernon Schryver Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Christopher Ambler Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Vernon Schryver Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Christopher Ambler Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, John Stracke Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Tripp Lilley

Previous by Date:	Antigen for Exchange, Marc Horowitz
Next by Date:	scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-), Randy Bush
Previous by Thread:	Denial of Service by Spamware?, Daniel Senie
Next by Thread:	Re: Denial of Service by Spamware?, Perry E. Metzger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]