At 10:43 15/01/2001 -0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
By the way, don't we have a problem with the current plans in 3GPP, to
burn a unique identifier inthe mobile phones and to use it as the lower
64 bits of the IPv6 address?
If the identifier is a valid EUI-64 identifier, I don't see that as any
different from putting an Ethernet card into an IP phone (no better, no worse).
GSM phones have burned IDs that are sent over the air too - that is how the
telephone operators can blacklist a stolen phone, even if the thief swaps
the SIM card.
Ideally, the IPv6 privacy extension should still work, of course....do they?
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald(_at_)Alvestrand(_dot_)no