ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

2001-01-22 10:00:02
Brian E Carpenter wrote:


- without "transparent" caches

Do you mean interception proxies, in WREC terminology?

Yes.


- no port restrictions

And no protocol type restrictions

- no NATs

How about adding IPv6 support?

Good idea.


(and whatever other abominations one might want to add to this list).
Seems like a good role for ISOC, for example :-)

The ISOC isn't a trade association, which is where such seals
of approval (and the associated b*ke-offs) tend to come from.

Maybe the IPv6 consortium or whatever they call themselves could do
this, since IPv6 is a (the only?) realistic alternative to NATs.

-- 
Henning Schulzrinne   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>