Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

ietf

Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

2001-02-14 20:20:02

At 05:53 PM 2/14/2001 -0800, Michael W. Condry wrote:

I assume with IPv6 there is no need for NATs.

IPv6 does not solve the need to renumber if you change providers (and no,not everyone can be a provider -- IPv6 uses CIDR, just like IPv4). Untilthat issue is addressed, there will be NATs. Even for v6.


Rgds,
-drc

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, (continued) Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Greg Minshall Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Greg Minshall harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Grenville Armitage Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Michael W. Condry Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad <= Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, John Kristoff Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush Message not available Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eliot Lear Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad

Previous by Date:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore
Next by Date:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]