Scott,
Thanks for your message:
From slawrence virata.com Tue Mar 13 07:38:11 2001
If you think that there is a reason to tell the MUA about the source
(personally, I don't see what I would do with such a thing), then
argue for a new header that does that (and get mired in the
security/trust issues already cited elsewhere), but don't try to
change the usage of Disposition.
You are absolutly right. I should try a registration for a new part
header, "Content-source-device:" and use "X-content-source-device:"
in the mean time.
Does anyone else think there would be value in such a header, even if
it were incompletely reliable?
Since this trancends just audio, would VPIM still be an acceptable WG?
Cheers,
James
P.S. Valdis: TCP requires its input to be buffered. You must have
been thinking of RTP or some other UDP-like destroyer of audio quality.