At 12:08 PM 8/1/2002 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote:
He is
doing nothing more than parrotting back ICANN's quite misleading press
release.
(Why is it that someone who claims such a major victory finds it necessary
to engage in such non-stop hyperbole and misirection?)
Actually, I was "parroting" reports from MSNBC, CNET, and other news
agencies. They summarized the facts of the Judge's decision. And the
Judge's tentative ruling summarizes the relevant facts leading in to the
case.
Correlating between what ICANN wanted back then and what Karl is
permitted, now, is not all that difficult.
In particular, the two points I cited stand out:
The reports are consistent in citing that Karl review only paper
copies at the ICANN offices and that Karl give 10 day's notice.
Those were the two factual points that I made.
Perhaps Karl can explain how all of his media buddies got it so wrong?
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave(_at_)tribalwise(_dot_)com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850