> In other words, does it matter that the only real public activity that
> folks participate in with ICANN is to attack it.
Yes it matters. That's the crux of the essense.
Word for the day: "legitimacy".
> Given that nearly all the folks dealing with ICANN seem inclined
either
> towards hyper-politics or hyper-criticism, what are the chances that
100%
> transparency will cripple what little is left of ICANN's ability to
get any
> work done at all. (Hint: The answer is 100%)
Bummer.
-t