Perry E. Metzger wrote:
John Stracke <jstracke(_at_)centivinc(_dot_)com> writes:
Mmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches. It'd be much
more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the
recipient's filters.
Are you kidding? They've been doing thing to explicitly evade filters
for years now. For example, ever notice groups of random characters at
the end of spam Subject: lines?
A spammer can claim that those there for legitimate technical reasons,
to help them to track responses/bounces. Sending 1000 messages gets
harder to justify.
--
/===========================================\
|John Stracke |jstracke(_at_)centivinc(_dot_)com |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com|
|Centiv |My opinions are my own. |
|===========================================|
|"Who died and made you king?" "My father." |
\===========================================/