Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input (fwd)

Aaron> I can easily imagine this is so,  although, as I say above, I have no
Aaron> facts to back this up. 

Wouldn't it be nice if people  based their feedback on facts, rather than on
what they imagine!  Well, at least you're honest about it ;-)

Aaron> If  sub-ip represents technologies  that don't,  and will  never, get
Aaron> involvement  from  a  "broad  spectrum  of the  IETF  community,"  we
Aaron> shouldn't institutionalize it. 

How would you define "a broad spectrum of the IETF community"?