And is that because members of the "larger" community were not allowed to
participate in those WGs whose decisions adversely impacted their interests?
Because, by your assertion, if they had participated, they would have been part
of making the WG decision, which would therefore not have been in the interest
of that remaining larger community :-)
-Vach
-----Original Message-----
From: moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu
[mailto:moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: vkompella(_at_)timetranetworks(_dot_)com
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
Let's particularly ignore the fact that
the folks closest to the issues have the most interest in getting the best
possible outcome.
increasingly often I find WGs whose definition of "the best possible
outcome" is inconsistent with, and in some cases almost diametrically
opposed to, the interests of the larger community.
Keith