ok so it's the location thing i "dislike", so maybe we can agree to
use (say) the Hilton chain in NA, Europe and Asia...
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:50:48AM -0800, Michael Speer wrote:
Tim,
Ah, I think you missed my point about this. If you can gaurantee a
hotel or a set of hotels
in a given location somekind of volume the pricing for the event goes
down. It allows
for pricing based on average attendance of all three meetings.
Michael
Tim Chown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:06:55PM -0800, Michael Speer wrote:
1. Pick a place and have the meetings there 3 times a year banking that
one could get
volume discounts and pricing for usage of the hotel. Other
standards bodies have done
this and seems to have helped them to survive.
i think on the contrary have 3 meetings but in north america, europe
and asia each year to maximise audience. there are cheap places in
europe, like madrid...
tim