RE: spam

Fam. van den Berg wrote:
Just a simple question: Can spam mail be caused by
violating RFC 2821?


What do you mean by "violating"?

Michel.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: spam, (continued) Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, J. Noel Chiappa Re: spam, Dean Anderson RE: spam, Christian Huitema RE: spam, Michel Py RE: spam, Fam. van den Berg RE: spam, John C Klensin RE: spam, Bob Hinden RE: spam, Tony Hain Re: spam, Paul Vixie RE: spam, Michel Py <= RE: spam, Michel Py Re: spam, J. Noel Chiappa A modest proposal (was: Re: spam), Peter Deutsch Re: spam, Dean Anderson Re: requiring payment (was spam), S Woodside Re: requiring payment (was spam), Rebecca L. Page Re: requiring payment (was spam), David Morris Re: requiring payment (was spam), Anthony Atkielski Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud Re: requiring payment (was spam), David Morris

Previous by Date:	RE: spam, Fam. van den Berg
Next by Date:	Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, shogunx
Previous by Thread:	Re: spam, Paul Vixie
Next by Thread:	RE: spam, Michel Py
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]