My answer to your question is that I want IETF, ISO and ITU to set nuclear
warfare standards, i.e. if for example you see a web site with a standard ISO
NW standard you know that it has dispersed critical manpower, inventories, has
an alternative transport system, reliable NW capable suppliers and survival
capability for dispersed staff. Plus cutting edge IETF protocol
implementation. So that I can choose to use the sites the same way I choose
ISO 9XXX.
Then Central Banks would be the first to practice those standards.
I am talking from my own experience of what goes on in a city after a
mega-terror attack. USA is not prepared for one, some of its cell phone masts
have no standy batteries and generators, that would be part of ISO/IETF NW.
USA network of mini-nuke detectors may have no power back up.
Nyagudi
My question was to the entire list, and it still has not been
answered.
gja
ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: NM Research
Subject: Re: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues
To: grenville armitage
At times feel free to insult me privately not on the list. The internet was
not made for e-commerce, its mission was to communicate during nuclear warfare.
Meanwhile you can wait for the blast - some says some tactical torpedoes may be
missing.
Nyagudi
grenville armitage <garmitage(_at_)swin(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au> wrote:
NM Research wrote:
[..partially coherent blather deleted..]
And this has *what* to do with the IETF?
gja
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!