RE: IETF58 - Network Status

Sitting in the Thursday plenary, I note none of the network-to-ad-hocflappage that have been plaguing us the past few days.


Did the attackers get bored and go home?

Did the accidental ad-hocers finally get their settings right?

Did someone deploy a good blocking mechanism?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, (continued) Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Perry E.Metzger Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Masataka Ohta Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Perry E.Metzger Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Masataka Ohta Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Perry E.Metzger Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Perry E.Metzger Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Masataka Ohta RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Paul Hoffman / IMC <= Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Michael Richardson RE: IETF58 - Network Status, bill Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Andrew Partan Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Theodore Ts'o Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Roland Bless Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Theodore Ts'o Re: IETF58 - Network Status, shogunx Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Roland Bless Re: IETF58 - Network Status, shogunx Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Michael Richardson

Previous by Date:	RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Randy Bush
Next by Date:	Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Steven M. Bellovin
Previous by Thread:	Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Status, Masataka Ohta
Next by Thread:	Re: IETF58 - Network Status, Michael Richardson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]