Re[2]: ITU takes over?

Paul Hoffman / IMC writes:

Absolutely agree with this sentiment. Anyone who starts an anti-spam
proposal with "All we need to do is digitally sign the {messages|SMTP 
transmissions}..." is completely unclear on how little governance 
there is in this area.


I agree, but isn't this what Yahoo has recently been talking about as
their magic solution to spam?  (None of the reports I've read has been
very clear on exactly what Yahoo has in mind.)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: ITU takes over?, (continued) Re: ITU takes over?, shogunx Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski Re: ITU takes over?, jfcm Re: ITU takes over?, Masataka Ohta RE: ITU takes over?, Tony Hain RE: ITU takes over?, Stephen Kent RE: ITU takes over?, Tony Hain RE: ITU takes over?, Paul Hoffman / IMC RE: ITU takes over?, Tony Hain Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski Message not available Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski <= PKIs and trust, Keith Moore Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: PKIs and trust, Leif Johansson Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta Re: PKIs and trust, Franck Martin Re: PKIs and trust, Valdis . Kletnieks

Previous by Date:	Re[4]: www.isoc.org unreachable when ECN is used, Anthony G. Atkielski
Next by Date:	Re: www.isoc.org unreachable when ECN is used, John Kristoff
Previous by Thread:	Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski
Next by Thread:	PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]