Re: PKIs and trust
2003-12-14 12:55:08
All of those statements, assertions, and so on can be made in simple
signed messages. When you get a message with statements about your
job, you verify that the message has been signed using your boss'
public key. What's the problem here?
Some of the problems occur when I start trusting software to tell me
whether to believe in the identity, authority, or role claimed by
someone I don't know personally. It gets worse if I start trusting
software to make decisions based on the things that people I don't know
personally tell me.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: ITU takes over?, (continued)
- RE: ITU takes over?, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: ITU takes over?, Tony Hain
- Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Message not available
- Re[2]: ITU takes over?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
- Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
- Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: PKIs and trust,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: PKIs and trust, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: PKIs and trust, Leif Johansson
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Re: PKIs and trust, Franck Martin
- Re: PKIs and trust, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- RE: PKIs and trust, Al Arsenault
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
|
|
|