Re: PKIs and trust
2003-12-15 08:12:27
Keith,
I've authored several papers that capture what I see as the essence
of your characterizations, in a simple form. The central notion is
that most of these relationships are NOT about trust, but rather
about authority. if one views them in this fashion, then it becomes
apparent that the entities that are authoritative for identification
and authorization assertions should be CAs, and we, as individuals
with many distinct identities, should expect to hold many certs, each
corresponding to one identity. This is what happens in the physical
world with most physical credentials: passports, frequent traveller
cards, etc.
Steve
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: PKIs and trust, (continued)
- RE: PKIs and trust, Tony Hain
- Re: PKIs and trust, Neal McBurnett
- Message not available
- Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Re: PKIs and trust, Leif Johansson
- Re: PKIs and trust, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: PKIs and trust, Keith Moore
- Re: PKIs and trust,
Stephen Kent <=
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Re: PKIs and trust, Stephen Kent
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Re: PKIs and trust, Stephen Kent
- Re: PKIs and trust, Masataka Ohta
- Message not available
- Re[2]: PKIs and trust, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: PKIs and trust, Franck Martin
Re: ITU takes over?, Ole J. Jacobsen
|
|
|