ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents

2004-03-28 23:44:13
from [Harald Tveit Alvestrand] [Permanent Link] 


--On 27. mars 2004 13:12 -0500 Scott Bradner <sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu> wrote:


Note: The changed IESG review of RFC Editor documents does NOT change
the  IESG review for individual submissions to the standards track or
individual  submission sponsored by an AD. These get full IESG technical
review, as  before.


I assumed that was the case

also WG informational and experimental documents I trust?


yes!
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shore-nat-reachability-00.txt, Pekka Savola
Next by Date:  Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Previous by Thread:  Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Scott Bradner
Next by Thread:  Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents, Noel Chiappa
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]