Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?
2004-06-25 16:33:35
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
My understanding was that IANA is a neutral, independent, technical
authority
"the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is a function performed by
ICANN".
There is a significant lack of clarity in these matters.
ICANN has a number of legal arrangements with the US Dept of Commerce and
its subagencies. The most relevant to IANA is a sole-source purchase
order that comes from the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration
(a sub-agency of the DoC) under which NOAA is purchasing an essentially
undefined thing called the IANA function and ICANN is providing that thing
for zero dollars.
Usually in a purchase order the flow of deliverables runs towards the
purchasor. In this case nothing particularly tangible flows towards the
NOAA, but there does seem to be a rather cloudy delegation of authority
from NOAA to ICANN. In addition there is the oft-asked and never answered
question of whether NOAA (or NTIA, another sub-agency of the Dept of
Commerce) has such authority to delegate in the first place. (The GAO did
examine that question and found the authority to be lacking.)
In any event, what commeth via purchase order can goeth via the lapse of
that purchase order. Unless there is some unwritten accord, ICANN has no
guarantee that it will continue to be able to act as the uncompeted,
sole-source provider of the IANA function.
The IANA function as practiced by ICANN appears to have at several
distinct parts:
1) The operation of the L root server. I have never heard one bad
word about ICANN's performance with respect to the L server As far
as I can tell, the hands on those knobs are very competent.
2) The assignment and recordation of "protocol numbers". This is the
classical Numbers Czar function. Again, this seems to be competently
handled, although I have heard complaints that processing of number
assignments is taking too long. And I have had my own concern that this
function is really something that more properly belongs under the IETF's
umbrella.
3) ccTLD assignment authority. This is the controversial function. This
is a job that requires IANA to decide who gets to act as the internet
presence of each sovereign nation (that is, each sovereign nation except
the US - US dealt with the .us TLD outside of ICANN and despite ICANN.)
Yes, there are competing theories of whether a ccTLD is a direct aspect of
sovreignty or is merely a database key that happens to be isomorphic with,
but not dependent upon, the existance of soverign states. My own sense is
that the latter theory is not flying well among the collective governments
of the world.
ICANN does not keep time cards, or at least it didn't when I last checked.
And there is a great intermingling of tasks among the ICANN/IANA staff.
These two aspects combine to make it very difficult to assign a
quantitiative cost or level-of-effort number to IANA as a whole and much
less to the distinct IANA tasks.
However, by observation it appears that the bulk of the cost, and trouble,
of IANA is in item #3.
I have had concern that ICANN, or rather IANA, is being used as a pawn by
political factions in a number of countries. ICANN's redelegations are
often based on fairly thin bodies of evidence and are supported often by
some rather questionable assertions (e.g. a letter relinquishing a ccTLD
that was on an otherwise blank sheet of paper without letterhead and over
the unverified signature of someone claiming to be the long lost contact.)
During my term I never felt that ICANN or IANA had the staff expertise to
be able to swim in those shark infested waters. However, my sense is that
with the advent of current president and other staff changes that ICANN,
oops, IANA, is perhaps better equipped for this now than it was 18 months
ago. But the question is still present: Might not the question of who is
the most rightful operator of a ccTLD be better handled by existing
organizations that are much more sophisticated in matters pertaining to
who is the rightful sovereign power of a nation?
--karl--
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: non-solution, (continued)
- Re: non-solution, Ed Gerck
- Re: non-solution, Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: non-solution, Ed Gerck
- Re: non-solution, Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: non-solution, Ed Gerck
- Re: non-solution, Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: non-solution, shogunx
- Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?,
Karl Auerbach <=
- Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?, Scott Bradner
- Re: Is the IANA a function performed by ICANN ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: non-solution, Ed Gerck
- Re: non-solution, shogunx
- Re: non-solution, Ed Gerck
- Re: non-solution, shogunx
- Re: non-solution, Vernon Schryver
- Message not available
- Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd), Dave Crocker
RE: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson (fwd), bill
|
|
|