You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first use"
clauses, do you?
Is there a "preferred" wording for it?
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Eric S. Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:56 PM
To: Sam Hartman
Cc: Florian Weimer; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Shuffle those deck chairs!
Sam Hartman <hartmans(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu>:
I think it would be wonderful if the free software community could
come to a consensus about what their requirements are.
That's not hard. We need licensing conditions that don't require us
to either pay royalties or sign legal papers, and which don't inhibit
re-use of the code by restricting the area of application.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf