RL 'Bob' Morgan <rlmorgan(_at_)washington(_dot_)edu>:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Brian Rosen wrote:
You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first
use" clauses, do you?
Is there a "preferred" wording for it?
I think you'll find virtually identical wording on this topic in several
well-known licenses:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php
Indeed. The language in these licenses represents the community consensus
about patent termination. Yes, there really is one; the official line of the
Debian project is an outlier, in dispute within Debian itself.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf