On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 22:48:16 +0100, Gert Doering said:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0500,
Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
So 40% isn't even *allocated* yet (saying that we're probably burning /8's
faster than needed, but only 36% of the available space is actually routed.
Sounds to me like we've got more time than 52 months, if we start doing
stuff now to increase the usage efficiencies....
Do we really *want* that?
I'd rather go for "legacy-free networks". Ditch v4, build proper v6
networks.
Well.. that *would* be a preferable solution. I was merely pointing out
that we're not quite as "up against the wall" as a projection of the burn
rate of /8's would indicate.
pgpHtFXczT8fn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf