|
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed
2004-11-09 09:02:22
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3819.txt was published in July
(blush!)...
Finally: I rather get annoyed when L1/L2 people tell me
"that's not the way our L1/L2 works!", blah, blah, blah.
Fine. Engineer us something that does work; stop telling
us to engineer for broken media. IP has won in the
marketplace in case they have been asleep for the last 10 years.
Mike
... and it is a BCP ...
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: IPv4 in the network, please, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- re: IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
- Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Tim Chown
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Michael Thomas
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed,
Spencer Dawkins <=
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Fred Templin
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Francis Dupont
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Leif Johansson
IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
RE: IPv6 in the network, please, matthew . ford
|
|
|