Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed

Hi, Fred,

"Orthogonal" isn't one of the options ... perhaps we should add it in NEWTRK?

RFC 3819 is BCP guidance for layer two protocol designers who want clue. The 
other PILC BCPs (3150 and 3155) are guidance for transport users who have to 
run over layer two protocols designed without clue. Similar environments, but 
different readers.

And thanks for asking!

Spencer
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Fred Templin 
  To: Spencer Dawkins ; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 12:11 PM
  Subject: Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed


  Spencer Dawkins <spencer(_at_)mcsr-labs(_dot_)org> wrote: 
    ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3819.txt was published in July 
    (blush!)... (snip) ... and it is a BCP ... 


  How does this work relate to RFC3150 (BCP48) and RFC3155 (BCP50),
  e.g., I don't see any "Obsoletes:" statements in the header?

  Thanks - Fred
  osprey67(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf