Re: Document Action: 'BinaryTime: An alternate format for representing date and time in ASN.1' to Experimental RFC2004-11-16 02:18:55On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Graham Klyne wrote: Has there been detailed discussion of leap second issues? What exactly does the revised text "ignoring leap seconds" actually mean (I think I can guess, but I also think there's some room for misinterpretation here)? I assume it means "assuming exactly 86400 seconds per day". --apb (Alan Barrett) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
|
||||||||||||||||