Personal opinion.
Would it not be nice if ISOC could sort of designate a yearly
amount to go to IETF instead of having to just cough up whatever
budget gap we seem to have?
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 05:23
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Adminrest: section 5
section 5 starts out saying
The IASA manages money from three sources:
1. IETF meeting revenues.
2. Designated donations to ISOC (both monetary and in-kind).
3. Other ISOC support.
then goes on to say
Note that the goal is to achieve and maintain a viable IETF support
function based on meeting fees and designated donations.
I see no reason whatsoever to eliminate the other ISOC support
from the second text - what benefit can flow from limiting the
way that the ISOC raises IETF support? - the first part of
section 5 is
fine - do not negate the flexability in the second part
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf