Hi Tom -
Ah ships in the night; yes, Carl, I think this is the best wording so
far.
Two queries in my mind. Looking at the ISOC Report 2003, I notice it
uses revenue rather than income that you use; is there any hidden
meaning in that? eg because it is incorporated as a nonprofit
organization?
Revenue and income are equivalent. In the non-profit world, we prefer
"revenue" to income and "excess of revenues over expense" to the word
"profit".
And reading between the lines, perhaps I should be less trusting of ISOC
so is
it sufficient to say periodic summary? Is there any implication
elsewhere of how often periodic is? I expect accounts at least every
12 months for any organisation, with them being more frequent for larger
organisations, even every three months for some.
I really wouldn't bother specifying that. My personal view? Quarterly is
always nice. But, I think that's something for the iaoc/isoc/etc... to
work out ... they can figure out if their specific actions meet the general
principle easily enough. And, I wasn't being at all distrustful here of
ISOC ... I was just trying to express the general principle in traditional
language.
(Same with your cash flow analysis ... while I always prepare those for
my organizations, it would be unusual require such a level of analysis
for external consumption, and it probably wouldn't give you a tremendous
amount of insight into the functioning of a cost center as that part
of the operation is backed by the overall organization. That's why
I just listed the usual 4 of revenue/income, expenses, assets, and
liabilities.)
Regards,
Carl
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf