Dave,
the announcement of this as a WG item for AAA is an error.
It should not have been announced that way - it should have been announced
as an individual submission.
In the past, we have been inconsistent in whether or not we recommended
that updates done after the WG's closing should be renamed to individual or
not, and I think the secretariat has been consistent in not policing it.
I think it is more clear to the audience what's going on if it's published
as an individual; after all, there is no WG to give "WG review" for this
document any more.
But I have not given instructions to the secretariat to block those.
Harald
--On tirsdag, februar 22, 2005 18:58:26 +0900 Dave Crocker
<dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:17:46 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
This is an error.
Harald,
Please explain.
I've looked over the documentation for I-D naming and do not see this
case covered.
What is particularly ironic is that these I-Ds began as individual
submissions and we were asked to bring them in, under Marid, just in time
for the working group to be disbanded.
So it is a bit odd to think that having Marid go away means that we
cannot get the documents published with a simple increment to their
series number.
Of course, we would have been glad to move them to the CLEAR working
group, had it been chartered.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf