Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Joe,
There is an agenda cutoff that WG chairs are supposed
to respect. This time it was:
> The agenda for the Working Group is due by Monday,
> February 28 at 12:00 ET (17:00 GMT).
But there were many late agendas and there was a glitch
in the process of posting them.
For BOFs, the formal BOF proposal must include an agenda,
and that was due this time on February 21.
We need to try and follow our own rules next time.
What we have, IMO, is a deadline, but not a "cutoff" - as in "miss the
date and you don't get to hold your WG".
Joe
Brian
Joe Touch wrote:
Hi, all,
With agendas appearing ever later - including last night, the issue of
cutoff dates should be revisited.
If reading the drafts to be discussed is NOT an issue, then the I-D
cutoff dates should be dropped.
If reading the drafts IS an issue, then, by correlary, there should be
a corresponding cutoff date for agendas - e.g., 1 week after the last
cutoff I-D date. Jjust as I-Ds that pass the cutoffs are not published
for this IETF, WGs that fail to meet that deadline should be CANCELLED.
Consider this a proposal, or at least a request.
Joe
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf