On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:04:52AM -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Not needing NAT is a minor value add for IPv6. But we have already seen
several major corporations publicly indicate that they intend to use NAT
with IPv6, even though they can get enough public address space.
Do you have pointers to these indicators? I assume the reason is lack of
PI space, or is it a mixture of the other commonly cited reasons?
Tim
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf