Keith Moore wrote:
At the same time for each AD there is more than one person in the
IETF who is more technically astute than that AD.
perhaps. however, it's hard to identify those people,
They're the ones disagreeing with the ADs in some cases ;-)
and they may not
have either the time/energy or neutrality that are required to do final
review.
Neutrality is a two-way street; it is required for ADs too, and they,
just like individuals, have had (and continue to have) their pet
perspectives.
if they do, they're free to put their names in the hat for the
next NOMCOM.
So the message is "get your employer to ante 80% of your time to the
IETF, or keep your expertise to yourself"?
NOMCOM descisions are not a lottery where you win the right to have your
input count more.
Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf