TIME OUT.
1. There was a last call for a BCP
2. It was suggested the BCP was at least in part based on erroneous data
3. Examples were given to support that claim.
4. Harald shared that he was irritated (thereby irritating the few of us who
weren't).
5. You (gja) write "you think this past week is the first time anyone's had
to put up with "mr Anderson" ?"
There are those that can see the paradigm shift in the above timeline and
those that are the paradigm shift in the above timeline.
Please don't confuse this with an RFC.
Best regards,
Nick Staff
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
grenville armitage
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:41 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Proper behaviour towards irritating persons (RE: I'm not going
to listen...)
Colin Alston wrote:
[...] throwing your toys out of the cot as soon as you perceive
something as a personal attack certainly doesn't mirror the attitude
that should be conveyed on these lists.
"as soon as" ? you think this past week is the first time anyone's had to
put up with "mr Anderson" ?
that's funny. no, really.
cheers,
gja (i've hugged my killfile today...)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf