-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Keith Moore wrote:
External reviews are what I'm favoring - external, independent reviews.
so when IESG provides the external review, that's bad, but when someone
else does external review, that's good?
Yup. When judges decide cases, that's bad. When juries do, that's good.
I disagree. part of IESG's purpose
is to do review from a broad perspective.
On that we agree to disagree; I see no such charter implied or expressed
in 2026 - and the fact that it notes the need for _independent_
technical review is, well, notable.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCzB3XE5f5cImnZrsRAqW2AJ9oPRu7ViJDiPrE8DpnW14OtlM1bQCfcHha
qQ/HwRBAkw63JvoFw9QdM30=
=mcyA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf