I am glad Randy Preshun now joins my call for additional expertise. This
Draft is particular: due to its political, cultural and commercial
implications, and their possible impact on the IETF, what is to be
considered is probably more what is not in the Draft than the technical
constraints introduced by the Draft, where I consider that we should simplify.
A first list of questions is under http://rfc3066.org/review.htm. Readers
should also address these questions. They are important enough to be
considered carefully, with an open mind. IMHO they call for a dedicated
document providing a clear, stable, politically protected IETF framework.
jfc
At 22:57 14/07/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
We are looking for reviewers for two ltru working group documents.
Language tags are used in many applications and protocols, so
we'd like to get as broad a review as practical of these:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-registry-09.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt
The working group charter is at
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
The issue tracker we've been using is at https://rt.psg.com/ (user
and password "ietf", all our queues start with the string "ltru-".)
Comments should be posted to ltru(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org If you're not a
subscriber
to that mailing list, there will be some delay while your posting is manually
approved. The working group last call will conclude July 28. If you take
the time to read either or both of these documents, but have no comments,
we'd still like to hear from you, so we will have an idea of how many people
have looked at the documents.
Randy Presuhn, ltru co-chair
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf