JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
On 21:25 25/08/2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer said:
If the IESG were to refuse to publish the Sender-ID document as it is,
it would not "police" everything: anyone can still do what he wants on
the Internet.
The only thing than the IETF can do is to "bless" or not the document,
Stephane,
just a remark here. In the RFC 3066bis Last Call case the IETF has the
capacity not only to "police" but to "impose" and "force". This is the
case when a memo documents a IANA registry. In the case of a standard
track memo, there can be an appeal before it is imposed. It seems not in
the case of a BCP.
Wrong. IESG approvals of a standards track draft or of a BCP are equally
subject to appeal within two months.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf