Russ Allbery wrote:
...
I think your criteria doesn't survive logical scrutiny. If other people
have access to the standard, can implement the standard, and can build on
the standard to create a newer revision of it, I can't imagine what
definition of "proprietary" you're using that would apply.
But mDNS is not on the standards track and LLMNR is proposed to be
on the standards track. That, I think, is why Stuart has raised the issue.
As long as they are Internet-Drafts they all have the same status, work
in progress, except that LLMNR has gained WG consensus.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf