In message
<17167(_dot_)14936(_dot_)141345(_dot_)6653(_at_)chiark(_dot_)greenend(_dot_)org(_dot_)uk>,
Ian Jackson writes
:
Sorry to be pejorative, but as a DNS implementor[1] I'm amazed to find
senior IETF/IESG people seriously contemplating the kind of namespace
confusion which is fundamental in the LLMNR protocol design.
What I find amusing is so many people asking the IESG to overrule a
WG's judgment, given how many people have complained about the IESG's
power to do exactly that. I haven't checked for overlap between the
two groups...
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf