Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed

On Aug 31, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Bill Manning wrote:

> On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:25, Peter Dambier wrote:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > > Margaret Wasserman <margaret(_at_)thingmagic(_dot_)com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Other than a few minor issues that are being dealt with in a -43  
> > > > update,
> > > > I don't think that anyone has raised a blocking technical issue  
> > > > with the
> > > > LLMNR specification during this IETF LC.  If you (or anyone  
> > > > else) has
> > > > intended to raise a blocking technical issue, either with LLMNR  
> > > > itself
> > > > or with its ability to coexist with mDNS, please make that  
> > > > clearer to
> > > > me.
> > Sorry I overlooked this:
> >
> > I dont count 25% of the root server traffic a minor issue.
> > With 90% of root server traffic used to be for localhost and with
> > 25% of root server traffic already for local, we are looking into
> > a major DoS attack. This might overload ISPs DNS servers it might
> > even bring the root servers down if they let it free!
>     i'm going to have to raise the point that Peters "root-server"  
> system
>     is his private "walled-garden" and not representative of the  
> Internet's
>     authoritative root servers.   Just for clarification.
>
> --bill

i want to correct  bills concern  that  , " peters public root server  
system" is
an alternative for  the existing ones  and there are several others .


-marc

http://www.public-root.com/


--
"Wer also allgemeine Aufklärung verbreitet, verschafft zugleich eben  
dadurch allgemeine wechselseitige Sicherheit, und allgemeine  
Aufklärung und Sicherheit machen Fürsten und Staaten entbehrlich.  
Oder wozu braucht man sie sodann?"
Les Enfants Terribles
www.let.de

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf