Keith Moore writes:
LLMNR isn't a competitor to mDNS. They attempt to address different
problems.
We see to be living in some kind of Alice Through the Looking Glass
world here. The llmnr drafts are even called `-mdns-' !
I favor adoption of LLMNR because in a world of disconnected and
intermittently connected networks there's a need for applications to
still be able to work - and being able to "work" includes being able to
lookup the same DNS names that the applications would normally use in a
connected network.
This is not what people are trying to deploy it for, and it is
distinctly unclear that LLMNR is at all the right answer for this
problem.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf